Fable-Busting: ETFs Are Consuming the World



“Software is consuming the world.”

The enterprise capitalist Marc Andreessen wrote these phrases again in 2011. From in the present day’s perspective, with corporations like Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta dominating the inventory markets, Andreessen’s commentary appears to have held up.

Had BlackRock CEO Larry Fink made comparable feedback about exchange-traded funds (ETFs) 11 years in the past, he likewise would look prescient in the present day.

But regardless of its phenomenal progress during the last decade, not all is nicely in ETF land.

ETF skeptics are rising louder, their criticisms extra pointed. Active managers — who’re completely unbiased, by the best way — imagine passive investing is distorting the inventory market. The effectivity of the capital markets might have elevated amid larger integration of the worldwide financial system, they are saying, however now ETFs are skewing the pricing effectivity of single securities. 

With these critiques in thoughts, what impact has passive investing, together with ETFs and mutual funds that monitor indices, had on the US inventory market?

The Rise of ETFs

ETFs are probably the most profitable monetary innovation of the final era. As of 31 October 2021, greater than 8,000 ETFs handle near $10 trillion in world property, based on ETFGI analysis. ETFs are usually not simply core funding merchandise for retail {and professional} traders but additionally for central banks. For instance, the Bank of Japan has acquired majority possession of Japanese ETFs by means of its quantitative easing (QE) program, which might have been unimaginable a couple of years in the past.

Of course, there is no such thing as a free lunch within the markets. The ETF trade’s success has come on the expense of actively managed mutual funds. Active funds have constantly misplaced market share to ETFs and listed mutual funds. The pattern is unlikely to gradual or reverse anytime quickly. The solely query is what the final word ratio between lively and passive will likely be. Conventional estimates anticipate passive merchandise will seize at the least two-thirds of the market.

The Rise of ETFs: US Equity Flows, in US Billions

Chart showing The Rise of ETFs: US Equity Flows, in US BillionsSources: ICI, FactorAnalysis

US Stock Ownership

But fearmongering apart, passive merchandise are usually not taking on the entire funding world. They personal solely a fraction of the overall US inventory market. Combined lively and passive funds personal solely 28% of US shares as of 2020, up from 26% in 2010. 

Pension funds, hedge funds, insurance coverage corporations, household workplaces, and retail traders are nonetheless the bulk homeowners of US shares. Their mixed market share — 72% — has barely budged during the last decade. Fund administration corporations like BlackRock and Vanguard, which handle $10 trillion and $7.2 trillion, respectively, are usually not as omnipotent an affect as in style notion would have us imagine.

Passive Is Not Massive: Percentage of US Stock Market Capitalization

Chart showing stock market capitalizations of different types of investorsSources: ICI, FactorAnalysis

Stock Trading by ETFs

Most passive merchandise monitor indices and so are likely to ignore company information. Active fund managers, alternatively, reply and react to those occasions, updating their valuation fashions accordingly. This leads to shopping for and promoting selections. If passive funds merely monitor their index within the face of elementary adjustments, ETF skeptics contend, aren’t they making fundamentals much less related and the markets much less environment friendly?

That is perhaps true if there have been only some ETFs. But there are 1000’s they usually replicate the conduct of lively managers. For instance, if an S&P 500 firm will increase its dividend, it received’t matter a lot for the ETFs monitoring the index. But it’s going to matter for dividend yield-focused methods and can seemingly improve the demand for them. The response might solely happen when the index is rebalanced, however the level is evident. Fundamentals matter for passive merchandise. As for lively ETFs, which have grown in style, they pay as a lot consideration to the information as lively mutual funds.

Ad for ETFs and Systemic Risks

Critics additionally preserve that ETFs have begun to dominate buying and selling in US shares. But it’s necessary to distinguish between major and secondary buying and selling. Most ETF exercise happens within the secondary market: The ETF merely adjustments arms, transferring from one shareholder to the following, with out affecting the underlying shares. 

As a share of whole US inventory buying and selling, ETF secondary buying and selling has remained nearly fixed at 25% since 2011. This regardless of 1000’s of recent merchandise and trillions extra in property underneath administration (AUM).

ETF Secondary Trading: Percentage of Total US Stock Trading

Chart showing ETF Secondary Trading: Percentage of Total US Stock TradingSource: ICI, FactorAnalysis

What concerning the major market exercise that happens when ETF shares are created or redeemed by the related members? In this case, the underlying shares are purchased or bought, so there’s a direct market impression.

Again, since 2011, as a share of whole US inventory buying and selling, ETF major market exercise has barely budged. ETFs account for an insignificant 5% of this buying and selling.

ETFs’ Share of Primary US Stock Market Activity

Chart showing ETFs' Share of Primary US Stock Market ActivitySources: ICI, FactorAnalysis

ETFs’ Impact by way of Factor Investing

Beyond analyzing ETF buying and selling statistics, how else can we measure the ETF impact on the inventory market? Stock correlation and dispersion are customary metrics, however they don’t reveal any constant developments within the decade since ETFs began to take off. Sometimes shares are extra correlated and fewer dispersed, however this appears cyclical relatively than structural.

What about issue investing, which primarily displays investor conduct? Does that yield any perception? As passive merchandise seize larger market share, index membership turns into extra necessary. Stocks outdoors main indices just like the S&P 500 draw much less curiosity, which ought to result in lowering valuations and market capitalizations. Positive and unfavourable suggestions loops ought to turn into stronger.

Financial Analysts Journal Current Issue Tile

And certainly, if we take a look at the worth issue within the United States, costly shares outperformed low cost ones constantly since 2009. The measurement issue did simply as poorly, as giant caps outperformed small caps. 

While it’s simple guilty the supposed demise of the worth and measurement elements on the rise of passive investing, that will be untimely. After all, between 1982 and 2000, an period of little or no passive investing, the scale issue generated unfavourable returns. Value investing additionally skilled many years of poor efficiency during the last century.

US Value and Size Factor Performance, Beta-Neutral, Long–Short

Chart showing US Value and Size Factor Performance, Beta-Neutral, Long-ShortSource: FactorAnalysis

Further Thoughts

Although ETFs are nice instruments for traders, their unique underlying objective has been corrupted.

“Active administration has failed. Just purchase the index by means of an ETF.” That was the preliminary pitch for the ETF. And it labored — for a handful of ETFs that monitor the S&P 500 and different main indices. But Wall Street is a gross sales machine and accordingly launched 1000’s of ETF merchandise. Investors have been lured away from the ETF’s first and most dear use case. After all, the optimum portfolio for many traders is a bland one composed of a few inventory and bond indices.

Tile for Puzzles of Inflation, Money, and Debt: Applying the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level

Today, there are greater than 2,000 equity-focused ETFs within the United States and solely about 3,000 US shares. These ETFs cowl each possible technique and are nearly all lively bets.

This is unquestionably not what the ETF’s creators had supposed.

For extra insights from Nicolas Rabener and the FactorAnalysis group, join their e-mail publication.

If you appreciated this submit, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.

All posts are the opinion of the creator. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.

Image credit score: ©Getty Images / jorgelum

Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can file credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.

Nicolas Rabener

Nicolas Rabener is the managing director of FactorAnalysis, which supplies quantitative options for issue investing. Previously he based Jackdaw Capital, a quantitative funding supervisor targeted on fairness market impartial methods. Previously, Rabener labored at GIC (Government of Singapore Investment Corporation) targeted on actual property throughout asset lessons. He began his profession working for Citigroup in funding banking in London and New York. Rabener holds an MS in administration from HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, is a CAIA constitution holder, and enjoys endurance sports activities (100km Ultramarathon, Mont Blanc, Mount Kilimanjaro).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here