State Farm hit with $6.5 million verdict over unpaid damage declare

0
80

A verdict has been served towards State Farm Insurance Company, ordering the insurer to pay $6.5 million to a girl who had sued the corporate over unpaid collision damage claims.

On August 29, 2019, Meghan Grove was concerned in an vehicle collision when a car crossed the middle line of Highway 45 in Mobile County, Alabama, and crashed head-on into her personal car. Following the crash, Grove suffered pelvic fractures, a fractured elbow, and a fractured wrist.

The driver at fault had restricted insurance coverage protection that was inadequate to cowl Grove’s accidents and the damages she suffered. Grove sought compensation via her underinsured motorist protection offered by State Farm.

However, State Farm refused to offer full payouts to Grove, and even tried to put the blame for the accident on her, regardless of bodily proof documented on the scene of the collision by investigating legislation enforcement officers suggesting in any other case.

Grove filed a lawsuit towards State Farm, alleging that the insurer dedicated a foul religion breach of contract.

In a trial in Mobile County Circuit Court, a number of medical suppliers testified on the severity of Grove’s accidents. On October 06, a verdict was introduced in favor of Grove.

“The jury on this case stood up not just for Meghan Grove but in addition for company accountability usually,” stated Robert Mitchell, a lawyer with Cunningham Bounds, LLC who represented Grove. “State Farm had each alternative to do the correct factor, but it surely made a deliberate determination to place earnings over defending its personal insured.”

Mitchell added that he hopes this outcome will “change the best way State Farm treats its policyholders.”

Read extra: State Farm ordered to pay $2.5 million in advantages to 2 policyholders

In late September, State Farm was ordered to pay one other $2.5 million in advantages to 2 clients in a separate lawsuit. And in August, the insurer entered a settlement with the State of Mississippi over the insurer’s alleged mishandling of claims associated to Hurricane Katrina.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here